<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for North Star Labs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://northstarlabs.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://northstarlabs.net</link>
	<description>System Administration hacks and howto articles.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Xen, SAN, LVM and host tagging by markround</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2007/05/31/xen-san-lvm-and-host-tagging/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>markround</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/2007/05/31/xen-san-lvm-and-host-tagging/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post. 

I&#039;m running a Xen SAN and am looking at doing the same thing you did - did you ever experience any LVM2 metadata corruption issues ? All my tests have shown sharing a volume group to be pretty safe as long as you are careful to keep volumes deactivated on the hosts that aren&#039;t using them (which is where the host tags come in useful), and take care to only make changes on one host at a time. But I keep seeing all kinds of dire warnings about running LVM on a SAN without CLVM...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m running a Xen SAN and am looking at doing the same thing you did &#8211; did you ever experience any LVM2 metadata corruption issues ? All my tests have shown sharing a volume group to be pretty safe as long as you are careful to keep volumes deactivated on the hosts that aren&#8217;t using them (which is where the host tags come in useful), and take care to only make changes on one host at a time. But I keep seeing all kinds of dire warnings about running LVM on a SAN without CLVM&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PS3 Media Server for Solaris by jmccune</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/07/ps3-media-server-for-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>jmccune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=174#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Ben,

I have plans to create &quot;official&quot; packages for MediaTomb binaries for solaris in the very near future.  I&#039;ll keep you posted on this with an article, so please subscribe to the RSS feed.  Were you able to get mediatomb running on your OpenSolaris system?  If not, I&#039;d be happy to help you.

-Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>I have plans to create &#8220;official&#8221; packages for MediaTomb binaries for solaris in the very near future.  I&#8217;ll keep you posted on this with an article, so please subscribe to the RSS feed.  Were you able to get mediatomb running on your OpenSolaris system?  If not, I&#8217;d be happy to help you.</p>
<p>-Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PS3 Media Server for Solaris by benjaminsson</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/07/ps3-media-server-for-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>benjaminsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=174#comment-472</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just installed OpenSolaris and set it up as a storage server.

Found your blog while searching for a DNLA server for Solaris.

Have you submitted a patch with your modifications to the MediaTomb project?
Or could you send them your binarys to add to the download page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just installed OpenSolaris and set it up as a storage server.</p>
<p>Found your blog while searching for a DNLA server for Solaris.</p>
<p>Have you submitted a patch with your modifications to the MediaTomb project?<br />
Or could you send them your binarys to add to the download page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PS3 Media Server for Solaris by jmccune</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/07/ps3-media-server-for-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>jmccune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=174#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Mike.  I actually ended up sticking with MediaTomb after finally getting it to compile cleanly.  MediaTomb been rock solid for me.

While it&#039;s not yet serving anything else than static media on the filesystem, I do have a post waiting to be published regarding Peapod automated video downloading, and I&#039;ll be investigating the scripting aspects of MediaTomb as time permits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Mike.  I actually ended up sticking with MediaTomb after finally getting it to compile cleanly.  MediaTomb been rock solid for me.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s not yet serving anything else than static media on the filesystem, I do have a post waiting to be published regarding Peapod automated video downloading, and I&#8217;ll be investigating the scripting aspects of MediaTomb as time permits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PS3 Media Server for Solaris by mike.lischke</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/07/ps3-media-server-for-solaris/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>mike.lischke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=174#comment-470</guid>
		<description>When it comes to Coherence documentation is not very extensive, nonetheless there *is* some. See here: http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/DocumentationDepartment. Additionally, I wrote a complete guide to set Coherence up on OpenSolaris: http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/SolarisInstallation, including SMF profile. Coherence is running very well and serving HD videos, sounds and videos (plus stuff from Apple Trailers, Flickr and whatnot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to Coherence documentation is not very extensive, nonetheless there *is* some. See here: <a href="http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/DocumentationDepartment" rel="nofollow">http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/DocumentationDepartment</a>. Additionally, I wrote a complete guide to set Coherence up on OpenSolaris: <a href="http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/SolarisInstallation" rel="nofollow">http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/SolarisInstallation</a>, including SMF profile. Coherence is running very well and serving HD videos, sounds and videos (plus stuff from Apple Trailers, Flickr and whatnot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solaris 10 Root Shell Recovery by jmccune</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/03/solaris-10-root-shell-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>jmccune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=140#comment-469</guid>
		<description>@Brent

Thank you for this suggestion.  I haven&#039;t run into this method while researching the root shell in Solaris 10, is this a common solution or a best practice as far as you know?

Thanks for contributing,
-Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brent</p>
<p>Thank you for this suggestion.  I haven&#8217;t run into this method while researching the root shell in Solaris 10, is this a common solution or a best practice as far as you know?</p>
<p>Thanks for contributing,<br />
-Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manually Migrate Tiger FileVault sparseimage to Leopard FileVault sparsebundle by jmccune</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2007/11/01/manually-migrate-tiger-filevault-sparseimage-to-leopard-filevault-sparsebundle/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>jmccune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/2007/11/01/manually-migrate-tiger-filevault-sparseimage-to-leopard-filevault-sparsebundle/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>@LolaM

A sparsebundle is always a folder containing many, smaller files.  The bundle is organized this way so that no single piece will exceed file size limitations such as FAT&#039;s two gig limit.

You might try using the hdiutil command to mount the volume as I mention in the article.

What a specific error messages are you receiving?  Have you checked your system logs in Console.app?

Cheers,
-Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LolaM</p>
<p>A sparsebundle is always a folder containing many, smaller files.  The bundle is organized this way so that no single piece will exceed file size limitations such as FAT&#8217;s two gig limit.</p>
<p>You might try using the hdiutil command to mount the volume as I mention in the article.</p>
<p>What a specific error messages are you receiving?  Have you checked your system logs in Console.app?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
-Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solaris ZFS Windows Sharing by jmccune</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/02/solaris-zfs-windows-sharing/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>jmccune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=130#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Note, it may be better to install the storage-nas profile, as documented at http://www.opensolaris.com/200811/openstorage/storagestart/

&lt;code&gt;pfexec pkg install storage-nas&lt;/code&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note, it may be better to install the storage-nas profile, as documented at <a href="http://www.opensolaris.com/200811/openstorage/storagestart/" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensolaris.com/200811/openstorage/storagestart/</a></p>
<p><code>pfexec pkg install storage-nas</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solaris 10 Root Shell Recovery by Brent</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/03/solaris-10-root-shell-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=140#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Instead of changing the shell, why not just add a line to ~root/.profile:

exec /usr/bin/bash

If something happens to bash, you&#039;ll just get a &#039;command not found&#039; error.

Cheers,
Brent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of changing the shell, why not just add a line to ~root/.profile:</p>
<p>exec /usr/bin/bash</p>
<p>If something happens to bash, you&#8217;ll just get a &#8216;command not found&#8217; error.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Brent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Solaris 10 Root Shell Recovery by jmccune</title>
		<link>http://northstarlabs.net/2009/04/03/solaris-10-root-shell-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>jmccune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://northstarlabs.net/?p=140#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Changing root&#039;s shell on a solaris machine has never bitten me personally, although I&#039;ve never been responsible for anything other than Solaris 10 machines.  I have heard first hand accounts regarding the prudence of this recommendation.

Evidently with Solaris 5.9 and earlier, changing the shell might prevent single user mode from working if the shell&#039;s linked libraries aren&#039;t accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing root&#8217;s shell on a solaris machine has never bitten me personally, although I&#8217;ve never been responsible for anything other than Solaris 10 machines.  I have heard first hand accounts regarding the prudence of this recommendation.</p>
<p>Evidently with Solaris 5.9 and earlier, changing the shell might prevent single user mode from working if the shell&#8217;s linked libraries aren&#8217;t accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
